One of my favorite writers, Morgan Housel, recently pointed
out the most profitable stock since 1968 in his article titled “The Extraordinary Story of America’s Most Successful Industry." Any guesses what it
might be?
The company with the best performing stock must have
revolutionized the world in some way. The product must have been innovative,
like computers or a cure for a dreaded disease.
Perhaps it was a small shop that became an international rage. Maybe it
was a company that has been on the cutting edge for the last five decades.
As sound as those assumptions are, they are all incorrect.
The best performing stock since 1968 is Altria, the cigarette company. While $1
invested in the S&P 500 in 1968 would now be worth $87, $1 invested in
Altria at the same time would now be worth $6,638. That is an annual return of
20.6% for a 47 year period. Not bad!
I mention Altria not to discuss the impact of buying an
addictive substance or the role of ethics in investing, but as a perfect
example of the benefits of diversification.
When thinking about the process of investing, it is human nature
to think of the factors mentioned in our guesses – the sexy ingredients to
success like technology or the garage shop going global. These are typical
descriptions of growth-style companies. Growth companies usually utilize their
profits to improve their systems, reach, or products. Further developing their
infrastructure and merchandise allows them to grow faster and generate more
revenue, and ultimately, more profits. This benefits investors in that the
price of the company’s stock increases as its ability to generate additional
profits increases.
Value-style companies are different. Value companies sell
products and services that no longer require significant ongoing innovation.
Consequently, rather than using profits to continue to expand, value companies
payout the majority of their profits in the form of dividends to shareholders. While
growth companies are new and exciting, value companies are frequently old and
quite boring. As you might imagine, cigarettes are essentially the same today
as they were 50 years ago. However, since
the tobacco industry hasn’t required a large expense to continually upgrade
their product, an unusually high proportion of revenues have been paid out to
owners of the stock.
Clearly, an exciting new product that everyone must have and
quickly generates tremendous profits makes a good growth company. A good value company, on the other hand, is a
company that earns mediocre profits for an extended period of time. Remember,
to be effective compound interest requires long holding periods. Thus, Altria
is a perfect example of a value-style company.
So is investing in value stocks a more profitable strategy
than investing in growth companies? As always when investing, the answer is “it
depends.” As Fidelity points out, value stocks did in fact outperform growth
stock for the 30 year period ending in 2010, with large cap value earning an
average annual return of 11.66% while large cap growth earned 9.91% annually
over the same time period. Further, large cap value stocks endured less
volatility over this period, with a standard deviation of 15.78 as opposed to
the standard deviation of 21.89 for large cap growth stocks.
However, since 1990, large cap growth has made more than 34%
during a calendar year six times, while large cap value has accomplished that
feat only once, and we don’t want to miss out on all those exciting growth
companies that are on the cusp of changing the world, right? Fortunately, the
point of diversification is to hold uncorrelated assets in our portfolio so
that when one asset category goes through rough times, other asset categories
might maintain or even increase in value. Investing in assets that respond
differently to various market events ultimately reduces volatility in our
portfolio as a whole, and thus, reduces risk. For this reason, growth stocks
are a wonderful compliment to value stocks.
The Dow Jones US Large Company Growth Index has performed surprisingly
different from the Dow Jones US Large Company Value Index in various market
environments since 1990:
|
1990
|
1991
|
1992
|
1993
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
Large Growth
|
0%
|
47%
|
4%
|
3%
|
42%
|
35%
|
-25%
|
Large Value
|
-8%
|
26%
|
11%
|
17%
|
15%
|
8%
|
1%
|
|
2001
|
2004
|
2005
|
2006
|
2007
|
2009
|
Large Growth
|
-20%
|
6%
|
2%
|
9%
|
11%
|
37%
|
Large Value
|
-8%
|
15%
|
12%
|
22%
|
2%
|
17%
|
While investing in companies on the verge of changing the world is exciting and worthwhile, don’t forget about the dull value companies with a tried-and-true business model and established market for their products or services. Due to lower expenses and higher dividend payout ratios, these value companies can be just as lucrative as those sexy growth investments. Fortunately, the benefits of diversification make holding both of these positions together more value than owning either by itself.
2 comments:
thanks for sharing informative post
vincethadani.tumblr.com
Hey dear! I am completely impressed by your posts on Financial Planning. I also want to become a Financial Planner. You know I am getting professional training from Professor Dr. Aloke Ghosh. He has great knowledge about finance and accounting!
Post a Comment